Finding the right specialized toolkit for cinematic scoring requires looking beyond standard Western orchestral libraries. When composers seek authentic Middle Eastern, Arabic, or Turkish string textures, Sonokinetic Sultan Strings frequently enters the conversation.
For many composers, the "better" aspect of Sultan Strings lies in its core philosophy: .
The recordings are dry, allowing you to use your own reverb, but they are captured in a way that blends perfectly with other cinematic libraries. Conclusion: Why Sultan Strings is the Better Choice sonokinetic sultan strings kontakt library better
Sonokinetic has fully embraced NKS (Native Kontrol Standard). If you use Komplete Kontrol or Maschine, the light guide shows you exactly which keys trigger which phrases. This is better for live performance. You can improvise a or Sama'i on a keyboard controller without ever looking at your computer screen.
You load a patch. You play C, D, E, F. You spend four hours programming velocity curves, CC1 dynamics, and CC11 expression to fake a portamento slide or a tremolo swell. Finding the right specialized toolkit for cinematic scoring
One composer on VI-Control captured this sentiment perfectly when describing Sonokinetic’s phrase-based approach: “Great way to add realism to your track. Also great inspirational launching off points”.
What do you primarily use (e.g., Cubase, Logic Pro, Ableton)? The recordings are dry, allowing you to use
It is designed for creative flow; you play, and it sounds right immediately. Conclusion: A Must-Have for Ethnic Textures
You require highly detailed, multi-mic orchestral options (e.g., Close, Decca Tree, Ambient mic positions).
Is Sonokinetic Sultan Strings the Better Kontakt Library for Eastern Strings?